Greenland: Scratch the Idea

Being able to respond quickly, anywhere and anytime, has been a hallmark of the US military since the Cold War. While we have long lasting military partnerships with many countries around the globe, certain military capabilities, such as strategic nuclear armament, is a diplomatic risk that host nations do not want to bear. Hence, there is a strong incentive to maintain small territories overseas. We can look to Guam, a Pacific territory of the United States; and Diego Garcia, in the British Indian Ocean Territory, as examples of forward-located military strongholds. Europe (also known as the 6th fleet and the European Command) is an exception. We have ships and Army units stationed in most NATO nations, France being a notable exception. What the United States doesn’t have is European territory of its own. Perhaps NATO members and other European allies prefer having a check on American military power. For the Navy, autonomous capabilities in Europe include the command ship USS Mount Whitney, 55 years of age; and the two fast combat support ships USNS Supply and USNS Arctic, both 30 years of age. None of these ships launches or lands jets, nor do they tender submarines. If a naval operation cannot be operated from these platforms, allied nations become essential to military success. Denmark recognizes what Greenland means to their own sovereignty, and Europe’s continued relevance in world affairs, more generally. The chunk of ice is too valuable for Denmark to sell or forfeit.