Hot Dogs are sold in packs of six, and buns in packs of
eight. I’m neither a hot dog nor a gun enthusiast, but I know the math doesn’t
add up on a proposed 12-round limit for firearm magazines in Virginia. 12
rounds is an important number in a military-heavy jurisdiction, as it is the
number of bullets needed to complete the Navy Pistol Marksmanship Test. Some
legislator had their heart in the right place, but failed to ask an expert: the
military’s preferred handguns use a magazine of 15 rounds, which would become
illegal under proposed laws. This is the default magazine of Beretta’s M9, and
the smallest NATO stock number, off-the-shelf magazine to complete the
Marksmanship Test.
The average sailor, who carries a firearm on duty, qualifies
with live ammunition once per year on the Navy’s budget. Firearm instructors,
however, recommend monthly practice to maintain marksmanship skills. Sailors
fill this gap by going to the range after-hours with their personal handgun;
this is an ingrained part of Virginia culture.
Then what about true high-capacity magazines? That question
is answered. Virginia has long banned firearm magazines over 20 rounds: It
applies in Virginia’s major cities and populous suburbs, when in public; and
has been law since 1991*. This law is not worded in heavy-handed language used
in the Northeastern states, but it nevertheless gives law enforcement the
authority to stop a violent crime before it happens. If this ill-advised
12-round limit becomes law, lawful gun owners would be required to purchase
slightly smaller magazines that won’t suit a legitimate and
government-sanctioned sporting purpose. We will know that the legislature has
placed virtue signaling over practicality and military readiness.
* See: §
18.2-287.4. Carrying loaded firearms in public areas prohibited; penalty.
No comments:
Post a Comment