Showing posts with label Ships. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ships. Show all posts
Monday, May 25, 2026
On Craftsmanship
Craftsmanship: trendsetting hipsters appreciated it, and taught others to love it too.
Once one began to think about the item (the craftsmanship), one might begin to think about the maker (craftsman).
How did craftsmanship fall to the wayside? Compensation is often based on deliverables. Engineers can take a results-oriented methodology and simply “swap the module” with a new part. Others will troubleshoot the problem and break out the soldering iron. (On consideration, an engine room Lots of spare parts lying around is likely able to afford paying its crew well).
The craftsman, versus the parts-swapper, goes unappreciated until the troubleshooting skill becomes unique.
The unicorn who is the “one guy” who can repair that license printer at the Coast Guard unit in Martinsburg WV, or “Gandolf”, the last person who knows the intern workings of the machinery control system.
Then, the craftsman becomes invaluable.
Wednesday, June 4, 2025
On Renaming Ships, Part II
If you can recall, several years ago I disagreed with renaming the USS Chancellorsville (CG-62) for several reasons: Firstly, there should be no opposition to honoring servicemembers who perish in a “losing” battle- instead, the argument was framed as “celebrating a Confederate victory”. Secondly, the ship CG-62 was already scheduled to be retired. Thirdly, Robert Smalls, an African-American Civil War privateer, deserved to have his name on a brand new ship- a capital vessel at that.
Our military’s tactical strength is in making a decision and following through, rather than re-litigating the past. In this regard, the very recent- and apparently unilateral- proposal to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, a newly-built fleet oiler (T-AO 206), is a flyball. Before the ship’s keel was laid, it was the California congressional delegation that pushed for a ship named in honor of Harvey Milk, himself a Navy veteran. Among them was Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Fears of a “gay ship” led to the compromise of giving Harvey Milk an auxiliary ship, crewed by “professional” civilians, rather than a combat ship crewed by often-teenage sailors.
The issues were discussed and a decision was made. On what ground should it be reopened, now that the ship is now in service?
Were civilian mariners requesting religious exemption from working onboard the USNS Harvey Milk? I have seen no evidence of this.
Did our military allies (particularly in the Middle East or Southeast Asia) request renaming of the ship? I have seen no evidence of this.
Did notorious sexual acts happen more frequently on this ship, than on other Navy ships? I have seen no evidence of this. And if “frociaggine” (using Pope Francis’ term) occurred on the ship, the UCMJ, with its prohibitions on fornication, does not apply to the civilian crew*.
The Secretary of Defense’s goal is to reclaim a fighting spirit, with a focus on “lethality, readiness, and warfighting”. Are you sure that renaming a fleet oiler ship contributes to that goal?
* There are restrictions on intimate relationships between supervisors and their subordinates; and implemented within the last three years, between maritime cadets and other crewmembers.
Views expressed are solely those of the author, and not the official position of the Department of the Navy or any of its subordinate commands.
Labels:
Harvey Milk,
Hegseth,
Nancy Pelosi,
Navy,
Politics,
Ships
Sunday, May 11, 2025
Tariff Talk
Tariffs; it's this year's inflation talk. I'm open to the idea of tariffs, particularly from imports on countries with lower labor protections and standards of living. I supported tariffs when Donald Trump was still a Democrat, reminiscing how import tariffs and excise taxes covered the full federal budget prior to 1913.
Our import tariffs were, and still are, lower than those of most other countries; we were a total mercantile nation of shopkeepers, or more accurately, patrons of big-box stores. We were told as Americans that it was okay to import "low cost" goods, like plastic toys, kitchenware, and appliances; since we exported high-tech equipment like industrial engines and aircraft.
Corporate greed, or the desire for greater profits, mean that imported goods aren't very cheap anymore, when it comes to big box retail. Bargains can still be found in marketplaces like eBay, where items are shipped factory direct to consumer. American manufacturers, in contrast to importers, carry the economic risk of capital equipment, and must expand their domestic market share, even at lower cost and profit margin.
In leading export nations like South Korea and Japan, foreign goods are expensive. In Korea, M&M Candies, for example, are three times the price of the local Lotte brand, at similar quality. When we talk about reciprocal tariffs in the United States, and impose them, we're increasing the price of imports by fractions, rather than multiples- as we see in the retail shelves of other countries.
I, being on a ship with room and board provided, may be protected from the direct costs of tariffs. I wonder, who is buying all those imports? It must be those Amazon Prime subscribers, the elite consumers, the upper-middle class bourgeoise who receive parcels of "stuff" every day to their doorstep. I eat American, my t-shirts and socks are made in America, so are my toiletries. Why worry about tariffs, I'll be fine!
"Well, have you thought about people who shop at the dollar store? Prices are going to go up from $1.25 to $2.00, or something". This man at the dinner table was right, abrupt changes would hurt the economically vulnerable. Store shelves could be empty of moderate-priced goods; the Port of Seattle's containership terminal is eerily quiet.
American capital must wait and see if this change in policy will be lasting. American manufacturing has been propped up by government purchases of cars, military equipment, and other items under Buy American clauses. There is less conviction, including among the Wall Street Journal set, that the protectionist policies will last beyond Trump's administration. Thus, no new factories at this time.
Monday, December 25, 2023
Eggnog Thoughts
I've never done a Christmas at sea. My ship was always in port, or I was on vacation.
Such was the case last year, when I was in a Singapore shipyard. Many of us went 'out to town' and came back to the officer's mess with stories of our adventures in the city-state, where most venues and activities are open on Christmas Day.
For Christians, Christmas is about the birth of Jesus; but in the broader societal sense, is about connecting with people, friends and family.
In contrast to my experience with United States public vessels, most ships do not take a day off for Christmas. You might need a tap on the shoulder to remember that it is a day of joy and merriment; at the same time the folks back home are caught up in their Christmas activities- shopping, church, and gatherings.
Here's to the seafarer in your life.
Labels:
Christmas,
merchant marine,
Ships,
Singapore
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)